Mission framing
Convert mission objectives, constraints, authorities, assets and evidence requirements into an inspectable planning context.
WP-002 · Draft architecture v0.1
OSOIX Mission is proposed as a decision-support architecture for planning, simulation, sequencing and risk assessment. It does not place a general reasoning model in direct control of spacecraft, propulsion, capture systems, emergency functions or other safety-critical execution.
Convert mission objectives, constraints, authorities, assets and evidence requirements into an inspectable planning context.
Produce multiple candidate sequences, including degraded, delayed and abort-oriented alternatives rather than one opaque recommendation.
Evaluate windows, geometry, communications, resources, safety envelopes, policy restrictions and verification requirements.
Surface uncertainty, conflicting observations, assumptions and unresolved dependencies before an operator decision.
Require authorized personnel to approve mission plans, changes and execution gates.
Record inputs, model versions, rules, alternatives, exclusions and approval history for later review.
Required inputs
Asset identity, authority, orbital state, sensor provenance, mission constraints, operational rules, communications availability, resource estimates and uncertainty declarations must accompany planning inputs.
Required outputs
Each recommendation should include alternatives, assumptions, confidence, rejected options, rule triggers, unresolved conflicts and the exact authority required for approval.
Explicit non-claims
This publication does not claim an operational mission planner, flight-qualified software, autonomous rendezvous controller, certified safety system, customer integration, funded demonstration or flight heritage. The next evidence step is a simulation-only reference implementation with deterministic execution boundaries and complete decision logs.