Observed state
Authenticated measurements with source identity, timestamp, calibration status, quality indicators and uncertainty.
WP-003 · Draft research architecture v0.1
OSOIX Twin is proposed as a provenance-aware representation of orbital assets, mission context and predicted behavior. It separates observation, estimation and simulation so uncertainty is visible instead of hidden behind a single dashboard value.
Authenticated measurements with source identity, timestamp, calibration status, quality indicators and uncertainty.
A reconciled representation derived from declared filters, assumptions and model versions rather than an unexplained single truth value.
Time-bounded forecasts with confidence intervals, validity horizons and sensitivity to uncertain inputs.
Geometry, mass properties, propulsion, power, thermal, communications, payload, degradation and maintenance assumptions.
Orbital conditions, conjunction context, radiation, illumination, atmospheric effects and external constraints relevant to the use case.
A non-authoritative simulation branch used to compare maneuvers, failures, delays, degraded sensors or alternative mission sequences.
Divergence
When observations leave the permitted uncertainty envelope, the twin should create a signed divergence event describing the prior prediction, actual observation, model version, elapsed horizon and operational impact.
Replay
Mission replay should preserve what operators and systems knew at each decision point. Later observations must not be silently inserted into earlier states, preventing hindsight from corrupting audit.
Explicit non-claims
This publication does not claim a production orbital-data service, validated high-fidelity dynamics engine, flight-qualified model, customer fleet integration, certified conjunction product or operational mission simulator. The next evidence step is a simulation-only reference twin with synthetic telemetry, model lineage and measurable divergence tests.